Objective: This study aimed to evaluate cuspal deflection (CD) and fracture resistance (FR) of maxillary premolars with Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities and restored with conventional and bulk-fill resin composites. Materials and Methods: One conventional (Filtek Z350XT) and two recent bulk-fill (Aura, and Reveal HD) resin composites were used. A total number of 120 maxillary premolars were used in this study. For CD test, 45 maxillary premolars prepared with standardized MOD cavity preparations and were divided into three groups (n=15). The different three resin composites (RCs) were used to restore the three groups. The CD values were measured using a digital micrometer five minutes after restoration completion. For FR test, 75 maxillary premolars were divided into five groups (n=15), positive control group (intact unprepared), and four groups received MOD cavities, negative control (prepared unrestored), and three groups restored as in CD test. A universal testing machine (Instron) was used to measure FR in Newton (N), and mode of failure was assessed. Results: The mean CD was significantly different in the three groups (p≤0.001). The highest deflection was noted in Filtek Z350XT (12.73±2.52 μm), the lowest was noted in Aura BF (5.60±0.74 μm). Highest FR was noted in the positive control group (1502±183.85 N) with significant difference with other groups (p≤0.001), followed by Aura BF (964.3±183.8 N) and Filtek Z350 XT (927.62±177.1 N) with no significant difference (p=0.501). The lowest FR value within the restored groups was noted in Reveal HD BF (787.9±98.2 N), and the negative control group revealed the lowest FR value in all tested groups (353.9±40.51 N). There was no significant difference between the materials regarding the failure mode. Conclusion: Bulk-Fill resin composites had less significant CD. However, fracture resistance values were material dependent.
(2022). Cuspal Deflection and Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars with Complex Class II and Restored with Contemporary Bulk-Fill Resin Composite. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry, 9(2), 45-51. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2022.241151
MLA
. "Cuspal Deflection and Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars with Complex Class II and Restored with Contemporary Bulk-Fill Resin Composite". Mansoura Journal of Dentistry, 9, 2, 2022, 45-51. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2022.241151
HARVARD
(2022). 'Cuspal Deflection and Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars with Complex Class II and Restored with Contemporary Bulk-Fill Resin Composite', Mansoura Journal of Dentistry, 9(2), pp. 45-51. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2022.241151
VANCOUVER
Cuspal Deflection and Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars with Complex Class II and Restored with Contemporary Bulk-Fill Resin Composite. Mansoura Journal of Dentistry, 2022; 9(2): 45-51. doi: 10.21608/mjd.2022.241151